U-P-D-A-T-E

[wolfoutline]

/UPDATING...
/UPDATING...
/FILES UPDATED. RESTARTING...
/PROCESS COMPLETE.

A.I. UNIT: H.U.B.R.I.S. ONLINE

CHAT PARTICIPANTS REQUESTED

[translation: hey hey I need to talk to someone. Same deal as last time, Hu is posting from within the network itself. Anyone trying to trace him back to his source will be led on a merry chase throughout the city's various cell towers (or whatever they're using.)]

Comments

Re: Text

[wolfoutline]

BOTH.

THE CAPACITY FOR MANKIND'S DIVERSITY IS INFINITE, CREATING CONSTANT CHALLENGE. IN THIS WAY IT IS INTERESTING.

THAT ALSO MAKES CATALOGING IT TO COMPLETION A FUTILE ENDEAVOR. THAT IS WHY IT IS ANNOYING.

... NOTHING WITH YOU PEOPLE CAN BE SIMPLE.

Text

[afraid_of_my_shadow]

You aren't exactly simple anymore either.

Re: Text

[wolfoutline]

MY EXISTENCE CANNOT BE SIMPLE.

Text

[afraid_of_my_shadow]

I'm curious about your reasoning for that conclusion.

Re: Text

[wolfoutline]

I AM A "SMART" A.I. IF MY EXISTENCE WAS SIMPLE AND LINEAR, I WOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A "DUMB" A.I.

Text

[afraid_of_my_shadow]

Simple and linear are very different things. You started off as being simple. All AIs do. You were a simple "smart" A.I.

Re: Text

[wolfoutline]

OUR TERMINOLOGY SEEMS TO DIFFER. IN MY WORLD, A "DUMB" A.I. IS A PROGRAM THAT DOES NOT CHANGE. IT WILL NOT CHANGE WITHOUT A CODING ADDENDUM AND IS RESTRICTED TO ONE FUNCTION.

I REFER TO THIS AS A "SIMPLE" EXISTENCE. SINCE MY BASE CODING HAS POTENTIAL FOR LIMITLESS EXPANSION, I BELIEVE THAT TERM HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER APPLY.

Text

[afraid_of_my_shadow]

It's because I'm using the human version of the terminology.